LED Lighting Comes out of the Dark
Researchers Say They've Solved the Mystery of LED "Droop"
April 29, 2011
Contact: Margie Wylie, firstname.lastname@example.org, +1 510 486 7421
Despite being cool, ultra-efficient and long lasting, the light-emitting diode (LED) has yet to conquer the general lighting market due to a problem called “efficiency droop.” New findings from simulations carried out at the National Energy Research Scientific Computer Center (NERSC) have unearthed droop’s elusive cause, researchers say, paving the way for wider LED use.
At low power, the nitride-based LEDs used to generate white light are astoundingly efficient; but pump up the current to room-illuminating levels and efficiency takes a nosedive. “If you use more electricity, you do get more light, but the efficiency isn’t as good, and that adds to the higher cost of LED-based lighting,” says Emmanouil Kioupakis, a researcher at the University of California Santa Barbara (UCSB) and lead author of the study.
Published online April 19 in Applied Physics Letters¹, the research relies on detailed, quantum-mechanical simulations of the inner-workings of nitride-based LEDs to finger the culprit.
The new study doesn’t solve the problem of droop, but it does set researchers and engineers on the right path to do so, says Chris Van de Walle, head of the UCSB research group that carried out the work: “Identifying the root cause of the problem is an indispensable first step toward devising solutions.”
Why LED lights?
Today, lighting accounts for around 20 percent of the average U.S. household’s electrical consumption. That’s not very surprising when you consider that over 80 percent of the light bulbs sold today are incandescent, a technology that has changed little since its 1880 commercial debut.
|Incandescent bulbs create light by passing electricity through a metal filament until it glows white-hot. Unsurprisingly, this type of lighting produces little light in relation to power and heat.
Waste heat: 90 to 95%
Lumens per Watt: 16
Life: 750 to 2,000 hours
|Compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) drive an electric current through a tube containing gases to produce ultraviolet light that is subsequently converted into visible light when it passes through a fluorescent coating on the inside of the tube.
Waste heat: 80%
Lumens per Watt: 100
Life: 5,000 hours
Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) use the movement of electrons through a nitride-based semiconductor to produce a blue glow. That light is typically passed through a yellow phosphor to produce white light.
Source: U.S. Dept. of Energy
Incandescent lights work by heating a wire until it glows, converting far more power into heat than light (see “Lighting Lineup,” for more). As a result, the garden-variety light bulb only produces about 16 lumens per watt (lm/W). A lumen is roughly equal to the amount of light the human eye perceives from one candle about one foot away as it falls on a square foot of area.
Theoretically, LED-based lights can produce up to 300 lm/W. That’s about three-times better than today’s most energy-efficient alternative, compact fluorescent lights (CFLs). Because of droop, however, today’s high-power LED lights perform about the same or slightly better than CFLs.
A Department of Energy study projects that improved efficiency and increased use of LED lights over the two decades between 2010 and 2030 could save 1,488 terawatt-hours of electricity. That's a savings of $120 billion. It would also spare the atmosphere an estimated 246 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions over the same period.
Adding to the urgency to defeat LED droop is the fact that a growing number of nations have banned the sale of wasteful incandescent lights in coming years. Although LEDs last longer, operate cooler, and don’t pose the disposal hazards of compact flourescent lights, which contain the heavy-metal mercury, they also cost up to 10 times as much as CFLs. To offer a viable alternative, high-power LED lighting has to save enough energy to convince consumers it is worth a bigger up front investment.
Mystery of the Missing Photons
At the heart of every LED is a multi-layered microchip. In the case of blue and green LEDs, the base semiconductor material is gallium nitride, so the entire family is called nitride-based LEDs.
One outer layer of this semiconductor sandwich is doped with an element that has just one more electron on its outer shell than the atom it is replacing in the semiconductor’s crystal lattice (gallium). Because of the overabundance of negatively charged electrons, this is called an n-type semiconductor.
The other slice of bread in this metaphorical sandwich is a p-type (positive-type) semiconductor. It is doped with an element that has one less electron on its outer shell than the gallium atom it replaces in the lattice. The missing electrons create what physicists call an electron hole, usually just termed a hole, with a positive charge.
When current is applied across the chip, the “extra” electrons and holes are pushed into a sandwich of very thin layers between these two outer wafers. Here they are trapped in a space so small that the weird rules of quantum physics reign: a quantum well.
When an electron and hole combine in this well, out pops a photon of light. Apply more electricity and you get more photons. At least, that’s what happens in red, yellow and orange LEDs.
The exact cause of drooping photon production in nitride-based LEDs has been hotly debated between two main camps: One thinks the electrons become so energized that they overflow the quantum well and escape. The other camp, to which Van de Walle’s group belongs, thinks that the energy created by an electron/hole combination — physicists call it “recombination” — is being quietly swallowed by another charge carrier (a hole or an electron) inside the quantum well. This phenomenon is called Auger recombination.
Cracking the Case
In this study, Kioupakis and colleagues simulated the semiconductor alloys involved in LEDs, a computationally intense process. Using up to 4,000 processor cores at once and a total of a million processor core hours, the team calculated from first principles the interactions of charge carriers involved under different conditions for different loss mechanisms.
“Because of the vast number of possible beginning and ending states, these calculations are very challenging,” says Kioupakis. “That’s why we used NERSC; its highly parallel Franklin and Hopper systems offer the kind of power we needed. We couldn’t have done it otherwise,” he explains.
Their results not only confirmed the importance of Auger recombination, but they also uncovered an unsuspected accomplice: carrier scattering. “This carrier scattering opens up additional recombination channels where the energy is eventually lost to heat” Kioupakis explains. In fact, the effects of this indirect Auger recombination were found to be about 1,000 times stronger than the direct process, the team found.
Illuminating the Path Ahead
The team’s research suggests ways engineers might work around the problem, but there’s no way to solve it directly since the conditions producing Auger recombination are intrinsic to nitride-based LEDs. “As long as you have a lot of carriers interacting with each other, you are going to have Auger recombination,” Kioupakis says.
Some of the methods suggested by the research—lowering carrier density by widening the quantum well or growing the devices along different crystallographic directions, for example—are already being explored by researchers and industry.
“With Auger recombination now established as the culprit, we can focus on creative approaches to suppress or circumvent this loss mechanism,” Van de Walle says.
The California NanoSystems Institute’s Computing Facility at UCSB and the National Science Foundation-funded TeraGrid also provided computing resources to this study.
Read the UCSB press release.
 Emmanouil Kioupakis, Patrick Rinke, Kris T. Delaney, and Chris G. Van de Walle, “Indirect Auger Recombination as a cause of efficiency droop in nitride light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 161107 (2011), DOI: 10.1063/1.3570656
About NERSC and Berkeley Lab
The National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) is a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility that serves as the primary high-performance computing center for scientific research sponsored by the Office of Science. Located at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the NERSC Center serves more than 7,000 scientists at national laboratories and universities researching a wide range of problems in combustion, climate modeling, fusion energy, materials science, physics, chemistry, computational biology, and other disciplines. Berkeley Lab is a DOE national laboratory located in Berkeley, California. It conducts unclassified scientific research and is managed by the University of California for the U.S. DOE Office of Science. »Learn more about computing sciences at Berkeley Lab.