NERSC responses are in bold.
7 in general, good 6 don't use (much) 5 batch info needs improvement;
want to understand queueing algorithm and policies;
interpret codes from qstat and cqstatl;
online tutorial for running batch confusing;
hard to find info on how to submit runs - like max memory sizes for different queues;
hard to find sample scripts)3 hard to navigate and search;
have smaller, more manageable parts;
info needs to be better organized
[New website organization by December 1998; new search engine by January 1999]2 NERSC home page graphic too big [ A new home page is coming soon.] 1 publicize website [ The welcome email we send to new users now does that.] 1 email whatsnew to all users [We will use email a lot more in FY99.] 1 provide better examples on multiple processor environment; show hot to clean environment upon termination 1 online tutorial for cft77 to f90 confusing 1 errors in C++ info 1 T3E status/downtime is posted too late 1 software pages need improving 1 hardware pages good 1 not useful 1 getting started pages good 1 info not always up-to-date 1 need revision dates [We are in the process of implementing these.] 1 Cray manuals take a long time to load